FBI Agent Testifies of Advance Warning of Malheur Wildlife Refuge Takeover Plan

According to testimony given by FBI Agent Chadd Lapp in the ongoing trial of seven defendants charged with conspiring to impede federal officers from fulfilling their duties as a result of their occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge that began January 2, 2016, the FBI received advanced warning of the plan on January 1, 2016.  It has been acknowledged during the trial that there were informants at the refuge during the occupation.

On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, Agent Lapp testified that on January 1, one day before the planned rally supporting the Hammonds, FBI agents learned there was a plan to take over the refuge.   Maxine Bernstein wrote in the Oregonian on September 29, 2016:

“Lapp said he heard the information from another agent. Ammon Bundy’s lawyer Marcus Mumford referred to an email sent to the chief regional refuge law enforcement office that he said made mention of ‘intelligence from four people within the militia about a plan to take the refuge.’

‘I remember telling him there was intelligence. It was a potential target,’ Lapp said. ‘It was really basic words…Malheur…wildlife refuge, and there may be a plan to take it.’

Under questioning from Mumford, Lapp said he conveyed the intelligence to several people in his office, but didn’t do anything further with the information.”

That nothing was done to prevent this plan, even with the short notice, is surprising given the testimonies made previously by Harney County Sheriff Dave Ward and Chad Karges, the manager of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, who both spoke of taking preventative measures prior to the January 2 rally.

Sheriff Ward testified earlier in the trial that after several meetings with Ammon Bundy prior to the January 2 rally and numerous emails, warnings, and his own research into what had happened at Bunkerville, Nevada in 2014, he prepared by moving the inmates from his jail in Burns, Oregon to the next county.  He added that he moved all of the weapons and ammunition to the jail, which could serve as a fortified bunker should something happen during the January 2 rally.

Chad Karges testified that “he made the decision to keep employees away after New Year’s Day because of the ‘continued intimidation and threats towards federal employees,’ ‘type of arms that they had,’ and the ‘type of stand they were taking.'”  Defense Attorney Lisa Maxfield asked Karges why no security was placed at the refuge before the rally, Karges answered, “at that time, federal agencies were being told the threat was towards the BLM, and the refuge hadn’t entered into the conversation.”

If the FBI had received information a day in advance of the takeover of the refuge, as Agent Lapp testified yesterday, why indeed weren’t steps taken to increase security at the refuge?  Clearly law enforcement and federal employees were concerned in the months leading up to the Hammonds returning to prison and the January 2 support rally.  Considering that, and the stand off that had occurred in Nevada nearly two years before, why would such a warning not be taken seriously?

With the well-known presence of the Bundys and the others who joined them in taking the refuge, as well as that of the Pacific Patriots Network and other “militia” groups in Burns, Oregon, for the support rally for the Hammonds, I find it difficult to believe there was a shortage of law enforcement in Harney County on January 1, 2016.  Why then was there no law enforcement presence placed at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge on January 2, 2016 after the FBI received warning of the planned occupation?

 

 

 

Leaves Are Changing

_20160909_172319

The leaves are changing color, and the days are taking on that golden fall tint.  September is settling in and the nights are growing colder.  I’ve always loved the season changes.  I nearly always find myself anxious for the switch from one passion to another, from the river to the slopes, usually with some quality single-track time in between.  I’ve been anticipating this fall for awhile, as it promises a return to those long-neglected passions.

School has started, and I’ve sent my youngest out into the world for Kindergarten.  An empty and silent house is perhaps the greatest, and most eagerly anticipated, change for me this past week.  I’m suddenly rediscovering just how many hours there really are in a day.

Change is also in store for my career as a writer.  I will no longer be contributing articles to Newsbud, though I wish them success.  I’m hoping to write more here on the blog again.  More importantly, with all this newly recovered time on my hands, I plan to finish my long overdue novel.  I’m eager to return my focus to fiction for a while, and I’m feeling a great sense of freedom and inspiration.

The leaves are changing, and I’m excited.

Wildfire in El Dorado: Was Justice or Vengeance Served in California Arson Case?

Cunha one

“I always wanted to be a firefighter, you know, the third generation thing, my dad and grandpa were firemen.”

On July 28, 2013, at around 12:05, a fire started in dry grass along the side of Highway 49 in Amador County, California, between the communities of El Dorado and Plymouth.  A 911 call was made at 12:07 by a passing motorist, and firefighters responded to the fire and quickly had it contained.  It burned approximately 0.2 acres of the oak covered hillside above the highway.  Within hours, a Cal Fire investigator was on the scene.  There had been no lightning strikes or thunder storms in the area for days, and after ruling out a discarded cigarette due to the weather conditions, campfire, hot engine pieces from passing cars, and other accidental human causes, the investigator determined the fire was started by an arsonist.  A small paper fragment at the ignition site led the investigator to conclude the arsonist used some sort of incendiary device to start the fire.

That same day, not far away, a 30-year-old Placerville, California resident, Benjamin Cunha, was attending the Amador County Fair.  Cunha is well known within the community.  He hails from a family of firefighters, his grandfather had served the Diamond Springs Fire Protection District as chief for 20 years, and his father retired from the same district after serving as a captain for 25 years.  Cunha had served in various volunteer positions since his teen years, including at the El Dorado County Museum and the El Dorado Western Railroad.

Becoming a firefighter was Ben Cunha’s goal, and he began taking college fire science classes in high school.  After graduating high school early, he took a seasonal job with Cal Fire, working six months a year, and also served as a volunteer firefighter for the Diamond Springs Fire Protection District.  In 2004, Cunha obtained a position as an apprentice firefighter at the El Dorado County Fire Department.

But growing up amongst firefighters and working as a firefighter wasn’t Benjamin Cunha’s only history with fire.  In August of 2005, Cunha made a decision he would come to regret “more than anything.”  He started a fire in the grass alongside a road in El Dorado County.  It would not be the only fire Cunha would light in El Dorado and Amador counties.  Over the course of that summer, and the following summer, Cunha lit numerous fires in grassy road side areas and hill side stands of oak trees.

Cunha was sentenced for those fires in 2007 and served his time in prison and on probation.  He settled back into his community, immediately getting a good job.  By the time the July 28, 2013 fire on Highway 49 started, Cunha was a successful and productive member of his community, enjoying the local county fair with friends and family.  But that didn’t matter when his presence at the Amador County Fair, a mere two miles from the fire on Highway 49, was noted by Cal Fire personnel.  After a second suspicious fire started on August 4, 2013, Ben Cunha was once again arrested and charged with arson.

“I wish I’d never done that, more than anything in my life.  But I did.  I did.”

Recently, in a phone call, Cunha explained to me why he lit the fires in 2005-2007.  He stated, “it was the stupidest decision I’ve ever made in my life, but, making $6.00 an hour and trying to support myself, I figured out, hey, I can make a few extra dollars, come in on my days off, and…I did that.  And I regret that more than anything in my life.  I also, I was trying to get a…I was being laid off, actually, in 2007, and I was trying to secure a position there.”  He gave similar reasons back in 2007, and he certainly isn’t the first person to light fires in order to profit from them.  This August 2, 2010 High Country News article gives some examples of other cases.

Cunha went on to explain, “it was a real difficult thing, there were six of us at that station, we worked in Caloma…they called us apprentice firefighters and we didn’t have a captain or anything there [they were supervised under the captain of the neighboring fire station]. I drove the fire engine.  We were there 24 hour shifts, 10 days a month…it was really hard, everybody was always just trying to scrape by because they wanted to be a firefighter so bad, they were willing to work that job for $6.00 an hour, even though you couldn’t really live on that.”

According to the book Fire Raisers, Freaks and Fiends:  Obsessive Arsonists in the California Foothills by Ed Nordskog, published in September, 2013, Cal Fire investigators were in the midst of an ongoing investigation into suspicious fires later attributed to Robert Eason, a former volunteer firefighter with the Capay Volunteer Fire Department the summer Cunha started lighting fires.  By 2006, the investigators were aware that Eason wasn’t the only person setting fires in the area. The book states that at one of the fire locations, “Cal Fire Captain and Investigator Tom Oldag found a time-delay incendiary device at this scene.  This device consisted of a single cigarette without a filter surrounded by four paper matches affixed to the cigarette with black tape.  Oldag, who was aware of the Eason fires that took place about eighty-miles away, was sure that this was not Eason’s type of device.  He now became concerned about a copycat arsonist in the area.”

Nordskog goes on to add, “Cal Fire and USFS investigators were extremely worried.  They realized they had an emerging series on their hands and the suspect was getting extremely dangerous.  The fires were all linked by location, time of day, ignition fuels, similar device, and ambient temperature.  The only factor that was good news for the investigators was that the fires were all set on days with very little wind, which every firefighter knows is the main critical factor in the spread of wild land fires.”

In July 2007, after yet another hot afternoon fire, a “witness reported seeing a yellow and black motorcycle in the area just before the fire broke out.”  Investigators had a camera placed along Sand Ridge Road, and the film showed a “small Toyota pickup being driven by a young white male passing through the area four times prior” to another fire.  The truck was identified as belonging to Ben Cunha’s grandfather, and the motorcycle as belonging to Cunha himself.  Investigators began surveilling Cunha, and according to Nordskog’s book, they suspected him of lighting at least fifteen fires.  Nordskog writes, “Cunha’s time records showed that he was not assigned to a fire station when most of the fires were reported.”

Captain Oldag began an investigation of Cunha’s personal life.  Not surprisingly, he found that Cunha “frequently wore firefighter tee shirts, boots, and other accessories,” and he “seemed to only hang out with firefighters and at fire stations,” according to Nordskog’s book.  It seems unlikely that a young man whose life goal is to be a firefighter would avoid all things firefighting related in his off hours.

More surprisingly, Nordskog writes that Oldag also discovered that a local fire chief recalled that “when Cunha was around ten or eleven years old, he and another Cal Fire chief in the area had recognized Ben Cunha as a ‘problem-child fire setter.’  They suspected him of setting several fires in and around his family’s home and had even watched the young boy to see if they could catch him in the act.  The chief said that Ben Cunha had been such a problem a decade before that they actually had to enroll him in a juvenile fire setter counseling program.”

Both Ben Cunha and his father have denied this claim.  Ben Cunha stated to me, “that was nonsense, that didn’t happen.  I got in trouble when I was like, seven or eight years old, for playing with matches, not lighting a fire, playing with matches.  Just as an educational thing, my dad took me to talk to the prevention officer…I was never in a juvenile fire setters class.”  His father, Ed Cunha, told me that he remembered speaking with a Cal Fire firefighter, the chief mentioned by Nordskog, years ago about a program, but didn’t remember that his son had ever attended it.  He also confirmed what Ben said, that he had been playing with matches and did not start a fire.

After Nordskog’s book was published, Ed Cunha again spoke to the fire chief Nordskog mentions in the book, and the man confirmed he was interviewed by Oldag, but denied making the statements in Nordskog’s book.   Additionally, that fire chief was still serving the Diamond Springs Fire Protection District when Cunha became a volunteer, and there is no indication that he voiced concerns about Cunha’s childhood then.   To date, I have been unable to reach the fire chief mentioned, or other Cal Fire personnel who might have knowledge about this.  I contacted the author, Ed Nordskog, via email, and asked about this and his response was that he has information from “multiple sources (more than one firefighter) that Cunha was involved in a Juvenile Firestarter’s type program as a young boy.”

In 2007, as Oldag was studying Cunha’s history, Cal Fire investigators watched Cunha’s every move, following him whenever he left his home.  Since Cunha often drove his motorcycle, airplanes were used to follow him around the countryside.  After watching Cunha light two more fires, the investigators made their move and arrested him Sunday, September 9, 2007.  In March, 2008, after reaching an agreement with the prosecutors, Cunha pled guilty to two counts of arson.  As part of his plea deal, Cunha agreed to give details to the Cal Fire investigators about the fires he started in exchange for transactional immunity from further prosecution.

Cunha explained, “Cal Fire investigators were pushing for, they wanted to know what fires I started.  So they came up with the…transactional immunity.  They said, ‘you have transactional immunity, in order to get the plea deal, one year in jail, five years of probation, but you need to sit down with the investigators and confirm all the fires that were set,’ and, ‘that nobody will ever charge you, nobody can do anything against you with that, this is transactional immunity.’  The judge explained it to me, everybody did, and so they said, ‘you have nothing to worry about.’  So I went in there and basically told them of every fire I knew of that was set, and that was that.”

Cunha received a six-year sentence, most of which was suspended by the court.  In his book, Nordskog describes this as a “galling move by the court.”  He writes that “the investigators who worked so hard on this case remain bitter to this day,” and “rumors were rampant that some retired fire chief had gotten into the judge’s ear and possibly influenced the sentencing.”  Cunha had a different explanation for the sentence when he told me that the District Attorney and the judge examined his case and his history and decided to give him another chance at life.  Cunha said they told him, “’you don’t have any criminal charges, you’re active in your community’ and they said, ‘we’d like to give you a second chance.  We think you’re a good guy, and you screwed up.’”

I have another idea as to why the District Attorney and the Judge felt Cunha deserved a light sentence.  Perhaps, like me, they heard rumors that Cunha was not the only firefighter involved in lighting these fires.  Another area resident that I spoke with, who wished to remain anonymous, stated, “things came out back then, when it first happened, that Ben was basically the fall guy for a much bigger operation that was going down.”  Could it be that Cunha, after receiving transactional immunity, claimed responsibility for fires that he didn’t start to protect fellow firefighters, believing he wouldn’t face additional charges?  When I asked Cunha about this, he was unwilling to discuss it, which is understandable, if true.

I asked Nordskog via email if he had heard any explanation for the fires that were started when Cunha was on duty, and he responded, “I have no doubt (based on my experience) that Cunha was lighting fires both on-duty and off-duty as most firefighter arsonists do.”  He added that Cunha drove a water tender and was “always alone and unsupervised.”  This is possible of course, but doesn’t explain the rumors of others’ involvement, which the investigators surely were aware of.

Cunha served his time, 365 days, in the El Dorado County Jail, and was released.  As part of his sentence, he remained on probation, and was required to wear a GPS tracking device during fire season.  The judge had warned him that any violation of his probation would land him in state prison to serve the suspended sentence.

Several months after his release, Cunha received a phone call that would land him back in jail for over a year.  Nordskog writes in his book that “Cunha did not seem to understand the extraordinary break he had received.  Within just a few months, he was rearrested by the local cops for violating his probation, being a felon in possession of firearms, and facilitating the sale of stolen property.”  Nordskog’s book was published while Cunha was in prison fighting the charges.

According to this December 3, 2008 Firehouse article, Cunha was “arrested on charges of violating probation, possessing weapons, facilitating the sale of stolen weapons and for a felon in possession of a firearm.”  It goes on to state, “Cunha was allegedly involved with people who stole weapons and helped sell them, Placerville police officials said.”  His bail was set at an astounding $10 million.  But the news reports fail to explain whether Cunha was ever convicted for these charges, or to explain how this apparent violation of his probation did not lead to his serving the suspended sentence in state prison, as the judge had warned would happen.

In fact, Cunha wasn’t convicted for any of these charges.  He told me, “a guy I knew, I met in there [jail], called me up one day and said, ‘Hey, I’ve got some guns I inherited from somebody,’ some nonsense story.  He said, ‘do you know how much they’d be worth, or would you want to buy them?’  I said, ‘well, I don’t want to get involved with anything like that, but you can call a friend of mine, he might be interested,’ and I gave him a phone number, and that was the extent of my involvement in the whole thing.  The guy got in trouble, and they brought up my name, they immediately came and arrested me, and they charged me with a felon in possession of a firearm, which I’d never done, I hadn’t touched them…I was stuck in jail for another year and a half on that, and it finally came to it that we were fighting this and fighting this, and we wouldn’t take any deals on it, and the judge finally wanted to know what was going on, they had a private meeting at the court, and they came out and they said, Mr. Cunha, just plead guilty to a violation of probation and you’ll go home today.”  And that is what Cunha did.

In 2011, Cunha was again arrested for a probation violation.  He was called to the probation office because something was going on with his GPS tracker, and when he arrived, he was arrested.  He asked what it was about, and was told his tracker wasn’t transmitting, that he must not have charged it, allowing it to go dead.  Cunha disputed that, saying he charged it every day, but he was sent to jail anyway.  He said, “I sat in jail for almost a month, 20-25 days, something like that.  My attorney went to them and said, ‘I want to look at your equipment to make sure it’s not malfunctioned,’ and they came back and said, ‘we’re going to go ahead and drop this case, we’re gonna dismiss it.’”  The next time he checked in with his probation officer, Cunha asked why the equipment wasn’t checked before he was arrested.  He said that he was told, “this was input from Cal Fire that was requesting you be detained, but they said, ‘yes, we realized the equipment was broken within the first week of you being detained.’”

“What I don’t understand, is why did a judge tell me, look me in the face, and tell me nobody could ever prosecute me for this.”

In the summer of 2013, Ben Cunha had completed his probation and believed the past was behind him. He told me his community “basically forgave me for what I did, they said, ‘yeah, you screwed up, you did what your punishment was and you moved on with your life.’”  But then came the two fires in July and August, 2013, and Cunha was once again arrested.  However, he wasn’t charged with the two 2013 fires, but rather was charged with two of the fires he had described to Cal Fire investigators back in 2007.

According to court documents, in “July and August of 2013, authorities investigated two new suspected arson fires in the El Dorado/Amador area.  Law enforcement determined that at least one of the fires was started using a time-delay incendiary device similar to the time-delay incendiary devices Cunha had admitted to using in the 2007-2008 series of El Dorado/Amador county fires.  Cunha was a primary suspect in the 2013 fires.  Rather than continue the investigation of the 2013 fires, and to curb the risk of any additional fires in the meantime, Cunha was charged in the current indictment for the two 2007 fires that the government alleged burned onto federal land.”

It didn’t matter that Cunha had received transactional immunity from the state to prevent further prosecution in exchange for giving information about those fires.  The sentencing document explains in a footnote, “Cunha received transactional immunity from state prosecutors for the information he provided to local law enforcement.  However, the uncompelled grant of transactional immunity by the state prosecutors does not bind the federal authorities.”  It goes on to cite court cases that support that position.

According to Cunha, the judge made clear his displeasure over the federal charges at trial.  Cunha told me that the judge said to the prosecution, “why are we here?”  The prosecutors responded that it was arson on federal land, and Cunha said the judge answered back with, “yes, but I believe the state took care of this issue ten years ago.  I’m not sending this man to prison for seven years, I want to send him home.”  Cunha went on to say that the judge “apologized to me over and over again.  The judge said this is not right, this is wrong…he also made a comment saying he felt that the investigators were unsatisfied with the original case and were pushing it.”  I am hoping to obtain a copy of the court transcripts from the trial to verify the judge’s statements.

There was no evidence to show he started the two fires in 2013.  A security camera on a bank that showed the highway leading to the fire location did not capture Cunha’s vehicle passing by on the days of the fires.  The tiny fragment of paper found at the July fire was supposedly an incendiary device similar to what Cunha had used previously, and that combined with the fact that he had been at the fair two miles away the day of the July fire, seems to be all it took to make him the prime suspect.  And that was enough to get him back into court to be sentenced to five years in federal prison for fires that Cunha believed he had immunity from prosecution for.

Cunha was sentenced to five years in federal prison on February 23, 2016, and ordered to pay $246,862.00 in restitution.  He was originally scheduled to report to federal prison in July, 2016 but due to health issues, has had the date postponed until October, 2016.  He has been on house arrest since 2013, which cost him his job due to the resulting time restrictions.  He stated, “I’ve been on house arrest since 2013, since day one of this case.  I don’t get any credit for that, I could be on house arrest for ten years fighting the case, and they’d still say, ‘okay, you have your full sentence to do.’  It doesn’t count for anything, even though they’ve taken away my rights, and I have no freedom to leave, or do anything.  I get zero credit for any of this.”

“The last year you can do in a halfway house, so they can teach you how to get a job, and live life.  And I’m like, well, I have a house, I had a great job…”

It is clear from Nordskog’s book, the judge’s statements, and from Cunha and his father, that the Cal Fire investigators were unhappy with the original sentence in 2007.  Captain Oldag seems to have made use of Cunha’s case in a series of seminars on arson investigation, one of the largest was at the national arson investigators conference in Las Vegas in 2013.  According to Ed Cunha, Ben’s father, Oldag was “extremely upset with the Judge’s decision and made his position on the matter known to Fire Officials across the state.”  One wonders if vengeance rather than justice has been served in this case.

Interestingly, in what strikes me as a remarkable coincidence, and an incredible stroke of luck, Oldag caught another arsonist red-handed in July, 2007, along the very same highway as the July 28, 2013 and August 4, 2013 fires Cunha was arrested for but not charged with.  According to this August 1, 2007 Cal Fire blog post, “Cal Fire investigator Tom Oldag caught an arsonist in the act in Plymouth Friday afternoon on his way to an unrelated fire that burned 19 acres near Jackson earlier that day.”  The article goes on to say, “according to Oldag, the arsonist, Juan Antonio Cardona, had just started the grass fire on Highway 49 a half mile north of town when Oldag drove by in a marked truck.”  Oldag is quoted as saying, “I just happened to be in the right place at the right time.”

According to the investigation report, this fire was lit on the west side of Highway 49, half a mile North of Plymouth.  Oddly, Oldag was driving with lights and sirens on as he passed Cardona on the highway, but Cardona, who admitted to drinking at the Amador County Fair earlier in the day, stated he didn’t hear the sirens until after Oldag had passed by.  In the fire investigation report for the July 28, 2013, the fire occurred on the west side of Highway 49, approximately one mile south of Bell Road, which intersects Highway 49 about six miles outside of Plymouth.  The incident reports for the two fires, however, put the latitude and longitude of both at almost exactly the same place!  Additionally, the August 4, 2013 fire also occurred at nearly the same location, according to incident reports.

With his February 23, 2016 sentencing, Cunha, now a husband and father, has little options left.  He remains at home due to his health condition, but will have to report to federal prison in October unless he receives an additional extension for medical reasons.  He spoke of the irony, that as part of his sentence, he would spend the last 15% in a halfway house in order to learn life skills to prepare him for his return to society.  As though he hasn’t already made a successful life for himself in spite of his past mistakes, a life the federal government will expend untold tax dollars removing him from for five years.

Cal Fire Investigates Suspected Arsonist For a Year, Fails To Stop Devastating Clayton Fire in California

Damin Pashilk, a resident of Clearlake, California, was arrested and charged Monday, August 15, 2016, for starting 17 wildfires.  The last fire Pashilk started before being arrested was the Clayton Fire, which at the time of this publication was 50% contained, but had already destroyed 175 structures, many of which were homes.  While serving a sentence for drug and weapons charges in the past, Pashilk worked on an inmate fire fighting crew.  He isn’t the first notable former inmate firefighter in California.  Wayne Allen Huntsman who started the September 13, 2014 King Fire that burned 12 homes and nearly 100,000 acres in California also worked as an inmate firefighter.

According to this August 16, 2016 LA Times article, Pashilk had been under investigation by Cal Fire for “about a year.”  This August 17, 2016 LA Times update on the story adds this, “Clearlake, Calif., resident Damin Pashilk has started or tried to start 17 fires in Lake County since July 2015, prosecutors said.”  That article goes on to describe other fires Pashilk is alleged to have started.  It states, “on July 27, Pashilk allegedly attempted to start a fire near the Holiday Island mobile home park in Clearlake. A week-and-a-half later, GPS trackers put his vehicle near where a matchbook had started a small blaze in Lower Lake, though it burned itself out. Four days later, the Clayton fire began.”

In other words, Cal Fire had nearly a year to catch this alleged arsonist.  They had him under surveillance.  Currently, they are charging him with 17 counts of arson, so they must have some evidence to support those charges.  But, remember, fire number 17 destroyed peoples’ homes.  It destroyed at least 175 structures, and still continues to burn.  If Cal Fire had reason to charge Pashilk with any of the previous 16 fires, why did they wait to arrest him?  Why did they wait until he started this most recent fire, the Clayton Fire, destroying peoples’ homes?

Here’s the answer offered by Lake County Sheriff Brian Martin according to this local CBS report. “It wasn’t until the Clayton Fire investigators had enough to make the arrest on Monday.  ‘You get one shot at this. If you take that shot too soon, you jeopardize bringing someone to justice who truly needs to be brought to justice,’ Martin said Wednesday.”

That after a year of investigation?

Just What is Transactional Immunity?

Let’s say a friend and I decide to set out on a protest mission against animal cruelty and we start a series of fires around the state at privately owned slaughter houses.  We also release wild horses being held in a Bureau of Land Management facility and light the corrals on fire.  At some point, we get caught.  Faced with years in prison, I agree to a plea deal that includes cooperating with the prosecution by giving details of every fire my friend and I started while on our crime spree, including the fire at the BLM’s wild horse facility.  My end of the deal includes only facing one charge of arson, and the prosecution agrees to give me transactional immunity.  What does that mean?

Transactional immunity is described here as follows:

Immunity from prosecution for an individual is generally sought when that individual has information necessary to the public interest, but has refused or is likely to refuse to testify or provide the information on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination. There are different types of immunity that may be granted in exchange for a person’s testimony.

Transactional immunity bars any subsequent action against the immunized person, regardless of the source of the evidence against that person.

This website offers an example of a bank robber receiving transactional immunity in exchange for giving details of the crimes he committed.  These details include the fact that the robber used some of the stolen money to purchase cocaine, another illegal act.  However, because of his transactional immunity, he cannot be charged for this purchase of cocaine.

Now, back to my hypothetical acts of arson.  After reviewing my record the judge finds I have no prior criminal charges, and believing that I acted on a strongly held belief against animal cruelty, she determines I made mistakes and decides to give me another chance.  She believes I understand the gravity of my mistakes and will not commit them again, and gives me a light sentence.  So I made my deal and I serve the short sentence I receive for my single charge.  I get out of prison and return to a productive life.  I believe the entire ordeal brought on by my rash decisions to be behind me.

However, the federal government decides to bring a charge of arson on federal property against my friend and I.  This charge means that I once again find myself back in court, because the federal government is not bound to the transactional immunity the state granted me in my plea deal.  Imagine my surprise when I’m sentenced to a federal charge of arson and am sent back to prison for five years!

Of course, this is a made up scenario and I certainly have no intention of starting any fires that aren’t in my wood stove, fire ring, or barbecue.  So, why did I feel the need to write this short blurb describing transactional immunity?  Well, I wanted to write this because transactional immunity plays an important role in the very real, un-made-up, story I’m currently working on.  Stay tuned…

Newsbud Confronts NBC News in New York City

NBC News Declines to Answer Questions

_20160804_135425

Newsbud’s Sibel Edmonds and Spiro Skouras traveled from Oregon to New York to spend several hours outside NBC News Headquarters at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York City today.  They joined with supporters and journalists from various media outlets to publicly request an apology and retraction from NBC News for the false report made during the July 15, 2016 coup attempt in Turkey that Turkish President Erdogan was seeking asylum in Germany.  NBC News made this report as the attempted coup was taking place, and attributed it to a “senior US military source.”  When this could not be verified, NBC News no longer reported it as fact, but countless media outlets had already disseminated the report, citing NBC News as the source.  NBC News offered no explanation or retraction for their false report.

Newsbud repeatedly contacted NBC News asking for an explanation and retraction of this report, and after receiving no response, Newsbud issued a call to action for supporters and journalists to gather outside NBC News headquarters in New York City.  The Turkish embassy also contacted NBC News to request an explanation and apology, and made their request public via Twitter.

The New York Police Department was notified of the event in advance, and an enclosure was formed with barricades to contain everyone who came to show support for the demand for an explanation from NBC News.  When Edmonds and a small group began to make their way to the main entrance of NBC News Headquarters, they were stopped and told to return to the enclosure to wait while a member of the NYPD went inside to request that NBC News send a representative outside to address the group.  Later, a member of NBC’s security team spoke with Edmonds and stated he would also request that an NBC representative come outside to answer questions.

Edmonds addressed multiple journalists and activists from inside the metal barricades, surrounded by Turkish and American flags, and signs calling for the US to extradite Fethullah Gulen to Turkey.  Turkish President Erdogan has blamed the attempted coup on Gulen’s network and supporters, and has demanded that the US extradite Gulen to Turkey.

After waiting for hours, Edmonds announced she had received word that NBC News declined to send any representative outside to answer questions.  Edmonds then made a statement requesting that the Turkish government ban all NBC employees and reporters from Turkey, and extended that request to other nations as well.  Also, she stated that Newsbud, along with various media and Turkish organizations, will work towards pursuing a lawsuit against NBC News.  Additionally, she asked all viewers to no longer watch or support NBC News.

You can watch the recording of the livestream of the event here, and continue to follow the story at Newsbud’s temporary home, Boiling Frogs Post.

Independent Media Heads to New York to Confront NBC Over MSM Lies by James Corbett

by James Corbett
TheInternationalForecaster.com
August 2, 2016

During the chaos of breaking news events like the failed coup in Turkey last month, reliable, factual accounts of what is happening on the ground are especially important. If the MSM had reported that President Erdogan had been killed or captured by the coup faction, for instance, or that he had fled the country, that information could demoralize the public and deter them from the types of protests that ultimately stopped the coup in its tracks.

Well, as it turns out, that’s exactly what the MSM was reporting during the key hours when the coup was unfolding and the 24/7 news channels were scrambling to cover the story. Specifically, MSNBC reported that “a senior US military source tells NBC News that US officials are hearing that Turkish President Erdogan, refused landing rights in Istanbul, is reported to be seeking asylum in Germany.” The on-air anchor then editorialized that this “can’t be good for Erdogan.”

To be fair, it wouldn’t have been good for Erdogan…if it were true. Which of course it wasn’t. But that didn’t stop the MSM from propagating the secondhand, vaguely worded, anonymously sourced rumor everywhere. A Google search for “Erdogan asylum Germany” produces over 900,000 hits, showing that the story spread all over the online (and presumably on-air) media world within hours. Turkish sources confirm that the story was also picked up and heavily circulated within Turkey on social media platforms by the coup faction itself.

So here it is: yet another provable lie circulated by anonymous military sources through their propaganda arm, the US mainstream media. This story is a pretty straightforward example of a psyop designed to be spread throughout Turkey and used to defuse the Turkish public’s violent counter reaction to the coup. It failed, so NBC pulled the story and moved on to their next pack of lies…

control-letmesay…Or they tried to. But the team over at Newsbud.com, the new crowdfunded alternative media organization put together by FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, picked up the story and ran with it. They sourced the phony Erdogan asylum story back to a tweet by Kyle Griffin, a segment producer for MSNBC, and started a Twitter campaign to get Griffin to retract the faulty information and explain how and why it was broadcast on air during the critical hours of the coup. After days of being bombarded by demands for an explanation, Griffin deleted the original tweet (without apology, explanation or retraction) and began blocking the hundreds of activists that were confronting him.

Unhappy with this response, Newsbud stepped up the pressure. They brought the matter to the attention of the Turkish Embassy in Washington, which then issued a demand for an apology from NBC News for their “unacceptable journalism.” The demand, predictably ignored by NBC itself, was picked up and reported by international media including The Daily Sabah and Russia Insider. But in the US…crickets.

Since NBC has yet to address this issue, Newsbud is taking it to the next level. Newsbud.com founder Sibel Edmonds—along with other Newsbud team members, television crews from Turkey, Russia and the US, and interested citizen journalists and activists—will descend on NBC headquarters in New York this Thursday at 12 noon Eastern time to take their demand for a retraction and apology right to the liars’ doorstep.

“We are requesting NBC News Corp’s spokesperson and executives in charge of news to receive us and be available to answer questions and make comments in front of our cameras,” Edmonds explained to The Corbett Report via email, adding that they will be seeking an official public retraction and an explanation of why this information from their “senior Pentagon source” was broadcast without any fact checking or corroboration.

“If they refuse to meet us or let us in, we’ll show that live and recorded as well. Here is a mega USA news organization that is blocking other journalists and news organizations, refusing to abide by journalistic ethics to issue a public official retraction and explanation and apology on a proven, damaging false news story they circulated.”

sibelnewsbudNBC’s actions will be sadly unsurprising to those in the alternative media who have watched the MSM brush aside evidence of bias and false reporting for years. Asked why Newsbud is concentrating on NBC when all of the US mainstream media has a proven track record of such false reporting and participation with US military psyops, Edmonds explains: “We happened to have caught them in the psyop act as they did this. Had this been FOX or CNN or NYT we’d have done the same thing. NBC represents all of them.”

She adds that this is the type of action that people can expect from the newly-founded Newsbud.com, which reached the first step of its funding drive in June with a record-breaking crowdfunding campaign. “I know we are a news company, not a media watchdog. However, this is also to show people that all those so-called ‘media watchdog NGOs,’ funded by Rockefellers, Soros etc, with millions of dollars and hundreds of staff, which have been around for decades, have never done something like this.”

“You see, this is not about Erdogan or Turkey or one specific case. This is an opportunity to tackle several major issues related to MSM psyops and the propaganda machine, the false sense of security given to people with these ‘watchdog organizations’ financed and ruled by the same assholes. This is to show that we need to go beyond whining, bitching, moaning. What they expect (and always get): people/activists/bloggers screaming for a couple of days and then going away, chasing a new story. Well, we need to stop this ongoing cycle; grab their throat, stay on the story, and not let go.”

Any concerned citizens who are interested in joining Newsbud in this action are encouraged to bring their camera, microphone, pen and paper or any other reporting device and head to NBC headquarters at NYC Rockefeller Plaza on Thursday, Aug 4, at 12:00 pm ET. There will also be a press conference after the event.

*********************

This article was originally published here by James Corbett of The Corbett Report under a creative commons license.  If you have not visited the Corbett Report before, I highly recommend you do, there is a vast wealth of information there, on many subjects.